Alex wrote:
here's a question on these, after noticing the set up of the rEvo in the picture above.
It's been previously mentioned somewhere I recall (prob from plumb bob) but why would you have regular set up of tanks with valves at the top (over the shoulder) yet the rEvo looks to be inverted, as does the fire service in their breathing apparatus.
I would have thought that it would have been better for access in this set up?
(this probably needs to go somewhere else - gear or "ask a question I guess"
This one has been hammered out on several other forums, which of course makes it no less valid a question.
The impression from what I've heard is that the inverted vs standard debate boils down to:
Inverted Pros:
Easy access to valves
Less entanglement probability (maybe..)
Inverted Cons:
Valves and regs exposed to greater damage probability
Hose routing hassles
Folk look at ya funny..
There are bound to be more pros and cons but that's all I can remember off the top of my head.
We have the inverted tanks at work and I reckon they're great, I couldn't imagine the hassle you'd have negotiating tight confined spaces with a valve and reg in the "standard scuba" position.. But of course my scuba rig is non inverted..
There are setups for commercial work that have a bolted on protector for the valves and regs. But that extra length for hoses would be a sod..for rec diving
The valves look very unprotected on that breather setup.....